I'm going to respectfully disagree with Ref...I think Many Glacier is very pretty. It's wooded but many of the sites have nice views of the surrounding mountains and even those that don't, it's only a matter of steps to see spectacular views. It's more wooded than Rising Sun, but the sites are more private although there are more RV's than at Rising Sun.The Many Glacier campground, in my opinion isn't very "pretty", its in the middle of a dog-hair thicket of lodgepole pine, BUT it has awesome hiking options, BUT it also is almost always filled by noon or earlier, so its hard to find a campsite.
I've never camped on the west side, drove through the Avalanche Creek campground and it seemed really "busy", narrow roads, and small sites, so i didn't see a lot of Trailers or big RVs, but lots of people.
Driving through the Apgar campground I really had the feeling of being in a large housing complex or trailer park, but its still nice and in a pretty convenient locations.
Never been to Kintla, but I've heard good things, and if remote and rustic are what you're looking for Kintla or Bowman might be a good choice. Only drawbacks may be the driving time to get there, and the hiking options, not sure if there would be 5-6 days of hikes there or not?
Wasn't me that said the MG campground isn't pretty!Tara wrote:I'm going to respectfully disagree with Ref...I think Many Glacier is very pretty. It's wooded but many of the sites have nice views of the surrounding mountains and even those that don't, it's only a matter of steps to see spectacular views. It's more wooded than Rising Sun, but the sites are more private although there are more RV's than at Rising Sun.The Many Glacier campground, in my opinion isn't very "pretty", its in the middle of a dog-hair thicket of lodgepole pine, BUT it has awesome hiking options, BUT it also is almost always filled by noon or earlier, so its hard to find a campsite.
I've never camped on the west side, drove through the Avalanche Creek campground and it seemed really "busy", narrow roads, and small sites, so i didn't see a lot of Trailers or big RVs, but lots of people.
Driving through the Apgar campground I really had the feeling of being in a large housing complex or trailer park, but its still nice and in a pretty convenient locations.
Never been to Kintla, but I've heard good things, and if remote and rustic are what you're looking for Kintla or Bowman might be a good choice. Only drawbacks may be the driving time to get there, and the hiking options, not sure if there would be 5-6 days of hikes there or not?
You will want to avoid Apgar if you don't like RV's.
I agree, Two Med is also very nice and does have RV's but it's such a nice campground that it might not bother you to have them.
Sprague is wonderful, as is Kintla...which is well worth the drive to get there. But Ref's right, if you want to stay in the same place for 5 nights then maybe it's not the best place.
You could also check out the Cutbank campground. I've never stayed there but plan to...it's primitive camping but a very nice setting and the road in means you'll have few if any RV's (I think they're allowed but I think we only saw tents). This is also a place you might not want to spend 5 nights.
Good luck with your planning and have a great trip!
Most people on this site appear to prefer the east over the west side of the park, although both sides have their advocates. The Many Glacier region offers the best overall hiking opportunities on the east side, in my opinion, with many trails right outside your door. If you stay at St. Mary, you can access hiking along the GTTS Road (particularly in and around Logan Pass), and in the Two Medicine area, but you'll have to drive or take a shuttle to reach them.redchicago wrote:Thanks for the suggestions. I guess by primitive, I mean vault toilets are fine and pumped potable water. We plan on spending some time on the east side and some on the west. Of the two sides, which side should we spend more nights at?
The first night I think we;ll stay at St. Mary since we won't be arriving until evening. Any loop recommendations?
I don't mind if there are RVs somewhere in a campground, I just want to avoid being right next to one. If sites are large enough and afford some privacy, I'm satisfied.
redchicago wrote:Hi,
I'm planning a trip to Glaciier for mid July. I will be staying 7 nights and 6 full days. I'd like to see both sides of the park (East and West), any campground suggestions.
We will be tent camping and would prefer more rustic campgrounds that doesn't have many or any rvs/trailers.
If people could suggest a couple places on each side, it would be greatly appreciated!!!
It's been a couple years since we camped at St. Mary Campground. We made a reservation (so we could jump up to Many Glacier the next day). If I remember, with the reservation process, we were assigned a site and did not have a choice in the matter. At least you'll have a site waiting for you though.redchicago wrote:Thanks for all the suggestions.
The first night of the trip we'll be staying at St. Mary Campground for 1 night since we can get advanced reservations. We are coming from Theodore Roosevelt National Park in North Dakota, so we probably won't arrive until evening. Don't want to risk not finding a site.
any recommendation on nice sites or the best loops for tent camping?